I see a lot of pragmatic barriers like 140 IQ married couples deciding to mate for life and forgo working to create value, but they could probably be overcome with the right adjustments.
I think it would work in the sense that it would increase the average IQ of the population, but I suspect you’d see a lot more autistic people. That’s not necessarily a bad thing but you’d have to figure out a way to support high IQ autistic people so they can contribute to society in a way that doesn’t force them into environments incompatible with their neurotype. Otherwise you’ll just have a bunch of disabled people.
I see a lot of pragmatic barriers like 140 IQ married couples deciding to mate for life and forgo working to create value, but they could probably be overcome with the right adjustments.
I think it would work in the sense that it would increase the average IQ of the population, but I suspect you’d see a lot more autistic people. That’s not necessarily a bad thing but you’d have to figure out a way to support high IQ autistic people so they can contribute to society in a way that doesn’t force them into environments incompatible with their neurotype. Otherwise you’ll just have a bunch of disabled people.
I think you would see more neurological generic diseases like Tay-Sachs
I'd be curious to see how a negative eugenics program would affect the average IQ and the crime rate.
It works, and exists in South Korea
I'd suggest reading: "Have Dating Apps Really Ruined The Dating Landscape" by Nuance pill.
https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/have-dating-apps-ruined-dating