Imagine if every substack post was the quality of uncorrelated posts. Practically no contra him, contra her needed. Just letting the data speak for itself. Every post actually as good as its title.
Nooo! U are gatekeeping the term 'incel'!!! Acktually, that they are virgins doesn't tells us wether it is involuntary or not!1! One can be an incel sex-haver! One can be a 20 years old incel that'll fuck eventually as 98% of human beings and for it to-be-over!!!1!
I'll forever envy you if you don't face any comment like this from the incel advocates.
I have a question I read something on race and IQ a video that I feel wasn't very honest and it's arguments but I'm not really an expert on it so I can't really say if his arguments are good or not could I ask you about the video can you possibly take a look at it and give your thoughts
Okey, I like your article. It was necessary, after all part of the genetic explanation keeps being autism, and if BPers were consistent with their so called genetic determinism, they wouldn't undermine autism role as they currently do.
I don’t think it undermines Nuance’s point, after all the “autismpill” was the most “blackpill-like” stance of his, and its standpoint was studies that found autism overrespresentation in men that identified themselves as incels.
I think your article highlights the importance of incels’ wellbeing, independently of their physical appearance. Regardless if some of them “ascend” through looksmaxxing, others still won’t be able to do it and I’m also skeptical that “ascending” alone ‘fixes it’.
In a way what you have exposed is ‘hopium’ or a ‘whitepill’, but it also adds more uncertainty load for them, and one of the functions of the blackpill is to soothe life’s uncertainty.
Imagine if every substack post was the quality of uncorrelated posts. Practically no contra him, contra her needed. Just letting the data speak for itself. Every post actually as good as its title.
Nooo! U are gatekeeping the term 'incel'!!! Acktually, that they are virgins doesn't tells us wether it is involuntary or not!1! One can be an incel sex-haver! One can be a 20 years old incel that'll fuck eventually as 98% of human beings and for it to-be-over!!!1!
I'll forever envy you if you don't face any comment like this from the incel advocates.
This is a huge, well researched piece, and I applaud you for your effort.
I’m applauding extra loudly for putting a TLDR with real info in the beginning.
You’re the real MVP.
Thank you for NOT positing reddit tier brain dead TLDRs by putting them at the start and not the end
Do you mind if I ask you a question about a video I watched and ask you to take a look I didn't give your thoughts
I have a question I read something on race and IQ a video that I feel wasn't very honest and it's arguments but I'm not really an expert on it so I can't really say if his arguments are good or not could I ask you about the video can you possibly take a look at it and give your thoughts
Okey, I like your article. It was necessary, after all part of the genetic explanation keeps being autism, and if BPers were consistent with their so called genetic determinism, they wouldn't undermine autism role as they currently do.
I don’t think it undermines Nuance’s point, after all the “autismpill” was the most “blackpill-like” stance of his, and its standpoint was studies that found autism overrespresentation in men that identified themselves as incels.
I think your article highlights the importance of incels’ wellbeing, independently of their physical appearance. Regardless if some of them “ascend” through looksmaxxing, others still won’t be able to do it and I’m also skeptical that “ascending” alone ‘fixes it’.
In a way what you have exposed is ‘hopium’ or a ‘whitepill’, but it also adds more uncertainty load for them, and one of the functions of the blackpill is to soothe life’s uncertainty.